Accessibility Statement

Our approach

LeraLink is designed to make knowledge usable across languages, scripts, devices and forms of participation. Accessibility matters in public reading, member accounts, authoring, editorial review and administration. We aim to follow WCAG 2.2 Level AA as an engineering and editorial benchmark and to consider applicable requirements of EN 301 549 and European accessibility legislation.

Current assessment status

No verified independent WCAG audit or comprehensive conformance assessment is available for this statement. We therefore do not claim full or partial WCAG compliance, or claim that specific controls have been verified across all workflows. Functionality may differ by surface, browser, language direction, content type and assistive technology. This statement will be revised following documented testing.

Accessibility priorities

We prioritise keyboard and focus operation; semantic headings and controls; clear labels and error messages; readable contrast and scalable text; mobile reflow; language and direction metadata for multilingual and right-to-left text; accessible editorial workflows; and alternatives for audio, video and meaningful images. We also seek accessible tables, data visualisations and exported documents. These are product objectives, not an assertion that every feature currently meets them.

Third-party and tenant content

A tenant creates and manages its editorial content, including alt text, captions, transcripts, PDFs and multimedia. LeraLink may supply tools and guidance, but the accessibility of a particular published work requires evaluation on its own merits. Accessibility obligations vary by service, business size and activity. The European Accessibility Act's microenterprise service exemption may apply to the current operator if relevant statutory conditions are met; this does not lessen our stated accessibility ambitions or any other applicable obligations.

Feedback and alternatives

If a page or function is difficult to use, contact accessibility@lera.link with a URL, a short description and your preferred method of response. Please do not include sensitive medical information unless necessary. We will acknowledge the report and assess reasonable fixes or alternatives without promising unverified fixed turnaround times. Where the issue concerns a tenant's publication, we may coordinate with its responsible editor.

Review

Initial statement dated 30 October 2026. Assessment method: owner-provided product descriptions and document review; not an accessibility audit. A review date, tested surfaces, known non-conformities and remediation timetable will be added after the first structured accessibility assessment.